decommissioning

Font Size: A | A | A

Fort Halifax dam comes down, Sebasticook revives

By: Rupak Thapaliya  Friday July 18, 2008

With the start of dam breaching, this week marked an end to the long controversy in removal of Fort Halifax dam


Impacts from decommissioning of hydroelectric dams: a life cycle perspective


Source: Climatic Change
Volume: 84
Year: 2007

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from hydroelectric dams are often portrayed as nonexistent by the hydropower industry and have been largely ignored in global comparisons of different sources of electricity. However, the life cycle assessment (LCA)of any hydroelectric plant shows that GHG emissions occur at different phases of the power plant's life. This work examines the role of decommissioning hydroelectric dams in greenhouse gas emissions. Accumulated sediments in reservoirs contain noticeable levels of carbon, which may be released to the atmosphere upon decommissioning of the dam. The rate of sediment accumulation and the sediment volume for six of the ten largest United States hydroelectric power plants is surveyed. The amount of sediments and the respective carbon content at the moment of dam decommissioning (100 years after construction) was estimated. The released carbon is partitioned into CO2 and CH4 emissions and converted toCO2 equivalent emissions using the global warming potential (GWP) method. The global warming effect (GWE) due to dam decommissioning is normalized to the total electricity
produced over the lifetime of each power plant. The estimated GWE of the power plants range from 128-380 g of CO2eq./kWh when 11% of the total available sediment organic carbon (SOC) is mineralized and between 35 and 104 g of CO2eq./kWh when 3% of the total SOC is mineralized. Though these values are below emission factors for coal power plants (890 g of CO2eq./kWh), the amount of greenhouse gases emitted by the sediments upon dam decommissioning is a notable amount that should not be ignored and must be taken into account when considering construction and relicensing of hydroelectric dams


Author(s)

Sergio Pacca


Contact



Notes



Sullivan Creek Project to require surrendering of application

By: Rupak Thapaliya  Tuesday April 1, 2008

A FERC rehearing on the Sullivan Creek Project concluded that the current license for this project is still valid and the PUD will be required to apply for surrender of license for decommissioning.


Montana dam breached to allow for toxic cleanup and removal

By: Rupak Thapaliya  Monday March 31, 2008
Region: Northwest
States: Montana

The Milltown hydroelcetric dam in Montana that trapped toxic wastes, mainly arsenic, from mining operations was breached on Friday, March 28.


Benefit Dinner to Un-dam Klamath

By: Rupak Thapaliya  Tuesday February 19, 2008
Project: Klamath : P-2082

Klamath Riverkeeper is organizing a benefit dinner on Mar 14 in Bayside, CA to help bring down the four obsolete dams in the Klamath River.


Sullivan Creek Rehearing

By: Rich Bowers  Friday September 14, 2007

American Whitewater/Washington State Agencies file petitions for rehearing of an August decision of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finding that the licensee for the Sullivan Creek Project has no need to relicense the project.


Take a class in dam removal!

By: John Seebach  Wednesday July 18, 2007
States: Michigan | Wisconsin

The University of Wisconsin will hold a short course on Succeeding With a Dam Removal Project on November 5-7 in East Lansing, Michigan. Follow the "read more" link below for details.


Removal of Sandy River hydropower dams set to begin in summer 2006

By: Rebecca Sherman  Wednesday May 30, 2007
Project: Bull Run : P-477

A final tour of the Bull Run Hydroelectric Project on the Sandy River in Oregon sparked a series of Memorial Day weekend news articles.


Dams: here today, gone tomorrow? Positive signes of change at FERC


Source:
Volume: July 1994 p13
Year: 1994

Abstract

FERC has made great strides recently soliciting public input on whether they can and should "consider decommissioning of a project as an alternative to issuing a new license." Also, FERC has asked for input on how cumulative impacts of hydro porjects in the same reiver basin should be addressed. In respone to this request, various NGOs have weighed in with their opinion. The Hydropower Reform Coalition states FERC needs a "cradle-to-grave" approach in licensing that would fund the retirement of a hydro facility at the end of its useful lfe without burdening taxpayers. Furthermore, rather than review dams one by one, FERC should conduct river basin wide analyses, issuing licenses according to that plan.


Author(s)

Turner , E.


Contact



Notes

American Rivers produced abstract


2006 Removal for Bear River Dam in Idaho

By: John Seebach  Wednesday July 20, 2005
Region: Northwest
States: Idaho

Coalition members Idaho Rivers United and American Whitewater helped make a settlement promise become a reality: dam removal on the overregulated Bear River in Idaho.


Syndicate content