With the start of dam breaching, this week marked an end to the long controversy in removal of Fort Halifax dam
Fort Halifax dam comes down, Sebasticook revivesWith the start of dam breaching, this week marked an end to the long controversy in removal of Fort Halifax dam ![]() Impacts from decommissioning of hydroelectric dams: a life cycle perspectiveKey Words: carbon dioxide | CH4 | CO2 | decommissioning | greenhouse gasses | life cycle assessment | methane | reservoir emissions | sediment Category: Science/Ecology
Source:
Climatic Change
Volume:
84
Year:
2007
AbstractGreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from hydroelectric dams are often portrayed as nonexistent by the hydropower industry and have been largely ignored in global comparisons of different sources of electricity. However, the life cycle assessment (LCA)of any hydroelectric plant shows that GHG emissions occur at different phases of the power plant's life. This work examines the role of decommissioning hydroelectric dams in greenhouse gas emissions. Accumulated sediments in reservoirs contain noticeable levels of carbon, which may be released to the atmosphere upon decommissioning of the dam. The rate of sediment accumulation and the sediment volume for six of the ten largest United States hydroelectric power plants is surveyed. The amount of sediments and the respective carbon content at the moment of dam decommissioning (100 years after construction) was estimated. The released carbon is partitioned into CO2 and CH4 emissions and converted toCO2 equivalent emissions using the global warming potential (GWP) method. The global warming effect (GWE) due to dam decommissioning is normalized to the total electricity ContactNotes![]() Sullivan Creek Project to require surrendering of application
Project:
Sullivan Lake (Storage) : P-2225
A FERC rehearing on the Sullivan Creek Project concluded that the current license for this project is still valid and the PUD will be required to apply for surrender of license for decommissioning. ![]() Montana dam breached to allow for toxic cleanup and removal
By: Rupak Thapaliya Monday March 31, 2008
The Milltown hydroelcetric dam in Montana that trapped toxic wastes, mainly arsenic, from mining operations was breached on Friday, March 28. ![]() Benefit Dinner to Un-dam Klamath
Project:
Klamath : P-2082
Klamath Riverkeeper is organizing a benefit dinner on Mar 14 in Bayside, CA to help bring down the four obsolete dams in the Klamath River. ![]() Sullivan Creek Rehearing
Project:
Sullivan Lake (Storage) : P-2225
American Whitewater/Washington State Agencies file petitions for rehearing of an August decision of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission finding that the licensee for the Sullivan Creek Project has no need to relicense the project. ![]() Take a class in dam removal!
By: John Seebach Wednesday July 18, 2007
The University of Wisconsin will hold a short course on Succeeding With a Dam Removal Project on November 5-7 in East Lansing, Michigan. Follow the "read more" link below for details. ![]() Removal of Sandy River hydropower dams set to begin in summer 2006
Project:
Bull Run : P-477
A final tour of the Bull Run Hydroelectric Project on the Sandy River in Oregon sparked a series of Memorial Day weekend news articles. ![]() Dams: here today, gone tomorrow? Positive signes of change at FERCCategory: Policy/Law
Source:
Volume:
July 1994 p13
Year:
1994
AbstractFERC has made great strides recently soliciting public input on whether they can and should "consider decommissioning of a project as an alternative to issuing a new license." Also, FERC has asked for input on how cumulative impacts of hydro porjects in the same reiver basin should be addressed. In respone to this request, various NGOs have weighed in with their opinion. The Hydropower Reform Coalition states FERC needs a "cradle-to-grave" approach in licensing that would fund the retirement of a hydro facility at the end of its useful lfe without burdening taxpayers. Furthermore, rather than review dams one by one, FERC should conduct river basin wide analyses, issuing licenses according to that plan. ContactNotesAmerican Rivers produced abstract ![]() 2006 Removal for Bear River Dam in Idaho
By: John Seebach Wednesday July 20, 2005
Project:
Bear River : P-20
Coalition members Idaho Rivers United and American Whitewater helped make a settlement promise become a reality: dam removal on the overregulated Bear River in Idaho. ![]() |
SearchHRC & CHRC Working TogetherTo reduce duplication of effort and strengthen each organization HRC and CHRC have partnered to develop a powerful web presence. Click here to learn more about CHRC, the California Hydropower Reform Coalition. News Key Works401
Bush Administration
Clean Water Act
Congress
dam removal
decommissioning
Endangered Species Act
EPA
EPAct
FERC
fish passage
flows
Hydrokinetics
license amendment
license application
litigation
NEPA
new license
NMFS
PacifiCorp
preliminary permit
recreation
renewable energy
Salmon
settlement
Steelhead
superfund
tidal hydrokinetic
toxics
whitewater
Running Rivers NewsletterSubscribe
Most PopularEmailed
News Archive |
designed by Development Seed | powered by Drupal